Insights · Performance Analysis
Published: 15 September 2026 · by the QuantGovernor team
Win rate — the percentage of trades closed in profit — says nothing about profitability on its own, because it ignores how much is won and lost per trade. A strategy winning 90% of the time loses money if the rare losses are large enough; a strategy winning 40% of the time can be excellent if its wins are large. The number that actually decides is expectancy: the combination of win rate and average win/loss.
Expectancy per trade = (win rate × average win) − (loss rate × average loss). Two examples with round numbers: a system winning 90% of trades with average win 10 and average loss 100 expects 0.9×10 − 0.1×100 = −1 per trade — a slow loser with a beautiful win rate. A system winning 40% with average win 30 and average loss 10 expects 0.4×30 − 0.6×10 = +6 per trade — a solid earner that looks mediocre if you only read its win rate. (Illustrative arithmetic, not performance figures.)
The uncomfortable part: a high win rate is easy to build on purpose. Take profits tiny and quick, and let losing positions run — or average into them — and most trades will close green while risk accumulates in the few that don't. This is the signature pattern of martingale and aggressive grid systems: months of small wins, then one event that returns them all. On a track record it shows up as a superb win rate next to a scary average-loss figure and a deep equity line — exactly the combination we flagged in How to read a Myfxbook page.
We publish win rate on the strategy pages, but always in context — next to profit factor, drawdown and the full Myfxbook page where the loss distribution is visible. XAUUSD Adaptive Breakout is the cleanest illustration of the philosophy: a defined stop and target on every trade means the average loss is capped by construction, so its win rate means what it appears to mean. Where a component works differently — the declared averaging inside Copy Gold — we say so, and the metrics should be read accordingly.
Related: Maximum drawdown is not enough · Backtest vs live trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Risk warning
Trading leveraged financial instruments involves a high risk of losing capital and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance, even when verified, is not indicative of future results. The content of this site is informational and does not constitute financial advice; we never hold client funds. Full details in the Risk Disclosure.